Parade Gives Details On Kristen Stewarts & Robert Pattinson Earnings

Mar - 15 2011 | Sarah Peel | 4 comments

robert pattinson kristen stewart eclipse twilight

Parade has complied a list of celebrities, and what they earn. Robert Pattinson reportedly earned $27.5 million, while Kristen Stewart earned $28.8 million. Impressive pay checks for some of todays hottest stars.

They also report that Taylor Lautner earns even more than they do! He supposedly earned $33.5 million last, which is much more than his co-stars eraned last year. While this is good for Taylor, it makes us wonder why neither of the other stars earn that much? I always assumed that Robert, and Kristen had bigger careers.

Do you feel bad for Robert, and Kristen that Taylor earns more than they do in all of last year? Yes, this does not included just Twilight alone-but I don’t remember Taylor in any other big movies last year. So yes, it does come as a surprise that he earned more than they did. They also shared that Ryan Seacrest earned $51 million, while they named these stars with their earnings Johnny Depp($100 million), Daniel Radcliff($25 million), and others who earned millions last year. You can find the full list on Parade‘s official website.

article source-Parade


Posted Under

About Sarah Peel

Sarah Peel is a freelance writer/blogger who has written for many sites and is the owner of Miss Virtual Reality

4 Comments

  1. Lia says:

    maybe you should get your facts straight first, it’s not the money they got for their roles in twilight, but all the movies each of them did in a whole year, meaning last year… and taylor did more movies, while rob for example did a few where he didn’t earn millions per movie BUT a couple hundred thousand dollars!

  2. danybrean says:

    Smart girl Lia!
    Yes, get your facts straight.
    Taylor Lautner made more movies. Like Valentines Day for example. Do some research!

    Do we mind? These actors are earning millions, why should we care if they earn more than each other. We read about them to escape from our “not so rich” lives.
    And, they didn’t “share” anything, these lists are a matter of public record.

    A little more research would tell you, that it is often the case that actors take on a role for a reduced fee for a number of reasons. One being, they liked the story and wanted it made and cut their fee to make that happen.

    Happy to help! :)

    P.s. watch the typo’s

  3. Lisa says:

    Don’t hate on Taylor just cos he’s living the American Dream. He was a millionaire before he was 18, that’s pretty impressive. Taylor’s also doing action/thriller movies, which typically pay more than low-key dramas/indies that Pattinson and Stewart are doing. That’s true for all of Hollywood. Since they’re all richer than any of us could dream, does it really matter who is the richest?

  4. Lucy says:

    Like the posters above said,you’re sorely mistaken in your assumptions on Taylor and you lack research and therefore ommitting facts.
    Taylor did do a few other projects in between the twilight films. Plus he is also dealing on the business side of movie-making; He started his own production company which very few actors do aside from their acting roles. Taylor had the smarts to invest the money he has earned to give him monetary return. Add to that that he still earns from residual earnings from the movies he made as a kid.
    He is a movie and shaker not a sheep,doesn’t follow in any of he co-stars shoes, does what he likes to do in movies. What others do as far as their movie career choices aren’t always the best choices nor make the money they had expected it would.Granted it’s not about the money but like I said even it isn’t about the money the choices in movies weren’t all that entertaining or of quality to earn any accolades that then you can ignore whether it made money or not like some low-budget movies who went on to make it big later because they got great reviews and earned awards.

Write you response





Twitter

BSCkids on Facebook

My Cereal Box

Sponsor